Student: ___________________________ Topic: _________________________________

Use the following scale to rate how well the paper achieves the described criteria:

3 = Excellent; 2 = Good; 1 = Needs Improvement; 0 = Unacceptable

Abstract: The abstract clearly and concisely summarizes the content of the paper.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Grammar and Punctuation: Fewer than 5% of sentences have grammatical or punctuation errors and those that do occur are relatively insignificant in their effect on the flow of the paper.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Spelling and Word Usage: There are no misspelled or misused (i.e affect/effect; there/their; etc) words in the document.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Sentence Structure: Sentences are well constructed and easy to read and understand.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Tables and Charts: Tables and charts are used when appropriate. They are clearly designed and readily comprehended by the reader.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Length: The length of the document is adequate to fully address the topic and contains all the elements (introduction, materials and methods, etc.) typically found in scientific writing. The document indicates significant effort by the writer.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Organization: The document is well organized with a natural progression from one aspect of the topic to the next. The reader can quickly comprehend the material presented.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Page 1 Subtotal: _________________

Student: ___________________________

Use the following scale to rate how well the paper achieves the described criteria:

6 = Excellent; 4 = Good; 2= Needs Improvement; 0 = Unacceptable

Introduction: The relevance of the topic for animal production is clearly established. The working hypothesis is stated unambiguously and important terminology defined such that the reader is comfortable in his/her expectations for what follows.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Quantity of Data: The data presented represents at least three independent research trials.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Data Relevance: The data is directly applicable to the hypothesis and is from large well designed trials.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Internal Summaries: Each data set is summarized and the writer properly interprets the statistical and practical significance of the results

Rating: __________ Comments:

Final Conclusions: Final conclusions that insightfully synthesize the results of the independent data sets are presented. The reader is convinced of the validity of the conclusions.

Rating: __________ Comments:

Page 2 Subtotal: _________

Total Score: __________/51

Reviewer: ______________________________________________

All papers are written by ENL (US, UK, AUSTRALIA) writers with vast experience in the field. We perform a quality assessment on all orders before submitting them.

Do you have an urgent order?  We have more than enough writers who will ensure that your order is delivered on time. 

We provide plagiarism reports for all our custom written papers. All papers are written from scratch.

24/7 Customer Support

Contact us anytime, any day, via any means if you need any help. You can use the Live Chat, email, or our provided phone number anytime.

We will not disclose the nature of our services or any information you provide to a third party.

Assignment Help Services
Money-Back Guarantee

Get your money back if your paper is not delivered on time or if your instructions are not followed.

We Guarantee the Best Grades
Assignment Help Services