Directions
Review the case study and then answer the questions that follow.
Case Study
Today you are meeting with Miriam Rosen (she, her, hers), a 16-year-old girl, and her parents, Joel and Sarah. Miriam is 5′ 6″ and 97 pounds. She is well-dressed and well-groomed, but her hair is thinning; she is skinny (somewhat gaunt); and she has poor dentation. Meet Miriam and her parents (5:39 minutes) (Links to an external site.) (Miriam transcript (Links to an external site.)).
Questions
From your perspective as Miriam’s psychiatric nurse practitioner, answer the following questions in a two- to three-page double-spaced paper (not including the reference page) in APA format. Include at least two peer-reviewed, evidence-based references (not including your textbooks).
- Identify what interview questions you would have used to determine the underlying eating disorder, self-mutilation, and rape.
- Using the interpersonal therapy model, identify three specific goals for Miriam’s treatment, and in which phase each goal should be accomplished.
- Sarah, Miriam’s mother, asks why you are choosing interpersonal therapy and how it will be beneficial for Miriam. How do you respond? Compare and contrast it with humanistic-existential or solution-focused psychotherapy.
- What are the legal and ethical implications for you relative to a patient reporting a sexual assault? What is the best way for you to proceed? Reference your state of practice’s laws.
What to Submit
Your Microsoft Word document
If you copy and paste references from the course into your assignment, be sure to confirm APA formatting before submitting.
Similarity Score
- After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score.
- Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file.
- It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear.
View Rubric
| Short Paper | ||
| Short Paper | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Integration of Knowledge view longer description | 10 pts Demonstrates full understanding and application of course concepts integrated into own insights. Shows analysis and synthesis of ideas. 8 pts Demonstrates that you understand and have applied course concepts for the most part. Shows some analysis and synthesis of ideas. 6 pts Demonstrates that you understand and have applied course concepts to some extent. Some conclusions are not supported in the paper. 4 pts Demonstrates that you only partially understand and have applied course concepts. Most conclusions are not supported in the paper. 2 pts Does not demonstrate that you fully understand and have applied course concepts. | / 10 pts |
| Topic Focus view longer description | 10 pts The paper is appropriately focused. A thesis statement provides direction. 8 pts The paper is mostly focused. A thesis statement provides some direction. 6 pts The topic is focused but lacks direction. 4 pts The topic is too broad or too narrow. 2 pts The topic is not clearly defined. | / 10 pts |
| Depth of Discussion view longer description | 10 pts Includes in-depth discussion and elaboration throughout the paper. 8 pts Includes in-depth discussion and elaboration in most of the paper. 6 pts Includes in-depth discussion and elaboration in some of the paper. 4 pts Omits pertinent content or content runs on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh your own ideas excessively. 2 pts Only contains cursory discussion. | / 10 pts |
| Cohesiveness view longer description | 10 pts Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one point to the next. Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. 8 pts For the most part, ties together information. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material. 6 pts Sometimes ties together information. Paper mostly does not flow and much disjointedness is apparent. Demonstrates only some understanding of the relationship among material. 4 pts Rarely ties together information. Paper does not flow. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material. 2 pts Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be about disparate issues. Does not demonstrate understanding of relationship among material. | / 10 pts |
| Writing, Composition, Grammar, Spelling, References, and APA Format view longer description | 10 pts Excellently written and composed. No errors in format, references, spelling, and grammar. 8 pts Well written and composed. A few minor errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar. 6 pts Somewhat well written and composed. Many minor errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar. 4 pts Poorly written and composed. Major errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar, but still understandable. 2 pts Very poorly written and composed. Major errors in format, references, spelling, and/or grammar make it difficult to understand. | / 10 pts |
| Total Points: 0 |
Choose a submission type
