- Compute the five component ratios of a decomposition of ROE (net profit margin, total asset turnover, return on assets, financial leverage, return on equity) for IBM’s fiscal years 2016-2019 (present your results)
- Answer & Explanation
- Solved by verified expert
- 1.
- Net Profit Margin
- 2016 14.85%
- 2017 7.27%
- 2018 10.97%
- 2019 12.22%
- Total Assets Turnover
- 2016 68.03%
- 2017 65.18%
- 2018 64%
- 2019 55.99%
- Return on Assets
- 2016 10.11%
- 2017 4.59%
- 2018 7.07%
- 2019 6.20%
- Financial Leverage
- 2016 5.39x
- 2017 6.07x
- 2018 6.29x
- 2019 6.25x
- Return on Equity
- 2016 64.55%
- 2017 32.46%
- 2018 51.56%
- 2019 44.94%
- 2.
- For the net profit margin, the percentage suddenly dropped in 2017. This is the year that they made the lowest sales as well as the lowest net profit. The good thing is that, in 2018, the net profit margin increase again. The trend is decreeing in total assets turnover. Sales every year fluctuates but the change is minimal. The reason behind this is that the total assets increase every year but the increase in total sales is not proportion to the increase in total assets. The trend in net profit margin is the same in return on asset except for the result for the year 2019. Although the net profit increase, the return on equity decreased. This is because the total assets increased high this year. For the four years, the company have low return on assets. This means that they are not efficiently utilizing their resources which they must. Fi this continues, they may generate loss and they may have a liquidity problem. Every year, the financial leverage ratio increase. This means that the company is financed more on liability than equity. This can be related to the net profit because if the company borrows money, they will have to pay more interest and paying more interest will lower the net profit. There is no particular trend in return on equity. But, the 2016 result is the highest. This means that each and every investment in the company’s equity earned the particular net profit percentage. If the company maintain it high, it will attract more potential investors. and they will not have to borrow money from the bake.
- 3.
- 2016
- Q1 23.38%
- Q2 25.32%
- Q3 24.06%
- Q4 27.24%
- 2017
- Q1 22.94%
- Q2 24.37%
- Q3 24.20%
- Q4 28.49%
- 2018
- Q1 23.96%
- Q2 23.57%
- Q3 23.57%
- Q4 27.34%
- 2019
- Q1 23.57%
- Q2 24.84%
- Q3 23.37%
- Q4 28.23%
- 4.
- In 2016, the last quarter is the biggest contribution of the segment to the total revenue. Each quarter, the segment’s revenue is increasing. The trend is also increasing in 2017 and the fourth quarte percentage is higher than in 2016. The trend in 2019 is it goes up and it goes down but the last quarter increase is really big. Overall, the company must encourage the segment to make more revenue. They already make good revenue but they can still make more. If that happens, the net profit of the company will increase which they will use for their future operations and payments to shareholders in the form of dividends.
- 5.
- 2016
- Q1 46.50%
- Q2 47.90%
- Q3 46.90%
- Q4 50%
- 2017
- Q1 42.80%
- Q2 45.60%
- Q3 45.90%
- Q4 56.97%
- 2018
- Q1 43.20%
- Q2 46%
- Q3 46.90%
- Q4 49.10%
- 2019
- Q1 44.20%
- Q2 47%
- Q3 46.20%
- Q4 51%
- 6.
- Over all, each quarter, the percentage of gross profit is increasing. It is always the last quarter that they performed best because of the high gross profit percentage. The company’s segments can sell more products at a higher price and this is one of the reason why they have good net profit. If they can generate high profit not only on the last quarter, they can still achieve the2016’s net profit margin or even higher.
- 7.
- 2016
- Q2 8.32%
- Q3 (5%)
- Q4 13.23%
- 2017
- Q2 6.25%
- Q3 (0.71%)
- Q4 17.70%
- Annual (0.97%)
- 2018
- Q2 (1.66%)
- Q3 0
- Q4 16.02%
- Annual (1.01%)
- 2019
- Q2 5.38%
- Q3 (5.91%)
- Q4 20.80%
- Annual (1.53%)
- 8.
- Every quarter of every year, there is an increase and decrease of the segment’s revenue and they have no particular trend. From 2017 up to 2019, the total revenue is on a decreasing trend. This is al though they are generating higher gross profit. Motivating the segment to make more revenue is the best option. It is because they are making good gross profit and the reason is that they are regulating the cost of sales and this is a good strategy. So if they are motivated to make more sales, the revenue coming from them will be higher and there will be an increase in net profit. Of course, the company will incur costs to motivate the segment.
- 9.
- 2016
- Q2 11.58%
- Q3 (6.98%)
- Q4 20.72%
- 2017
- Q2 13.20%
- Q3 (0.06%)
- Q4 23.49%
- Annual (5.38%)
- 2018
- Q2 4.72%
- Q3 2%
- Q4 21.45%
- Annual 0.35%
- 2019
- Q2 12.07%
- Q3 (7.52%)
- Q4 33.34%
- Annual 0.35%
- 10.
- Like in revenue, there is also an increase an decrease in the gross profit. But unlike in revenue, the decrease is very minimal. As the revenue increase, the cost of sales also increase. This is so because of the cause and effect relationship that the have. The amount of changes in this pattern is quite acceptable and still favorable because it have a big increase and a very minimal decrease. This pattern can be maintained or improved by fixing a particular percentage of gross profit that will cover all their other expenses plus profit.
- 11.
- Among the segments, the global technology services is the segment that positively influenced IBM. It is because the revenue generated from this segment is the highest while its cost is not that high. Therefore, this segment provided the highest percentage in the total gross profit of all the segment.
- 12.
- Based on the results, the company’s best year is 2016. It changed in 2017 but starting 2018 it began to strengthen the operations and it really showed on the result of the performance. Since the company experienced a mini downfall, they will make sure that it won’t happen again. Their performance is improving each year and they will continue performing well. The over all sales will improve with the help of each segments. If they planned their next operations, they must first think how are they going to utilize their resources efficiently. Because if they will know, they will have good returns and they will maintain their liquidity and solvency.
- Step-by-step explanation
- 1.
- Net Profit Margin = Net Profit / Revenue
- 2016
- Net Profit Margin = 11,872 / 79,920
- Net Profit Margin = 14.85%
- 2017
- Net Profit Margin = 5,753 / 79,139
- Net Profit Margin = 7.27%
- 2018
- Net Profit Margin = 8,728 / 79,591
- Net Profit Margin = 10.97%
- 2019
- Net Profit Margin = 9,431 / 77,147
- Net Profit Margin = 12.22%
- Total Assets Turnover = Revenue / Average Total Assets
- 2016
- Total Assets Turnover = 79,920 / 117,470
- Total Assets Turnover = 68.03%
- 2017
- Total Assets Turnover = 79,139 / [(125,356 + 117,470) / 2]
- Total Assets Turnover = 65.18%
- 2018
- Total Assets Turnover = 79,591 / [(123,382 + 125,356) / 2]
- Total Assets Turnover = 64%
- 2019
- Total Assets Turnover = 77,147 / [(152,186 + 123,382) / 2]
- Total Assets Turnover = 55.99%
- Return on Assets = Net Profit / Total Assets
- 2016
- Return on Assets = 11,972 / 117,420
- Return on Assets = 10.11%
- 2017
- Return on Assets = 5,753 / 125,356
- Return on Assets = 4.59%
- 2018
- Return on Assets = 8,728 / 123,382
- Return on Assets = 7.07%
- 2019
- Return on Assets = 9,431 / 152,186
- Return on Assets = 6.20%
- Financial Leverage = Total Liabilities / Total Equity
- 2016
- Financial Leverage = 99,078 / 18,392
- Financial Leverage = 5.39x
- 2017
- Financial Leverage = 107,631 / 17,725
- Financial Leverage = 6.07x
- 2018
- Financial Leverage = 106,453 / 16,929
- Financial Leverage = 6.29x
- 2019
- Financial Leverage = 131,202 / 20,985
- Financial Leverage = 6.25x
- Return on Equity = Net profit / Total Equity
- 2016
- Return on Equity = 11,872 / 18,392
- Return on Equity = 64.55%
- 2017
- Return on Equity = 5,753 / 17,725
- Return on Equity = 32.46%
- 2018
- Return on Equity = 8,728 / 16,929
- Return on Equity = 51.56%
- 2019
- Return on Equity = 9,431 / 20,985
- Return on Equity = 44.94%
- 3.
- 2016
- Q1 = 18,684 / 79,920
- Q1 = 23.38%
- Q2 = 20,238 / 79,920
- Q2 = 25.32%
- Q3 = 19,225 / 79,920
- Q3 = 24.06%
- Q4 = 21,770 / 79,920
- Q4 = 27.24%
- 2017
- Q1 = 18,155 / 79,139
- Q1 = 22.94%
- Q2 = 19,289 / 19,139
- Q2 = 24.37%
- Q3 = 19,153 / 79,139
- Q3 = 24.20%
- Q4 = 22,543 / 79,139
- Q4 = 28.49%
- 2018
- Q1 = 19,072 / 79,591
- Q1 = 23.96%
- Q2 = 18,756 / 79,591
- Q2 = 23.57%
- Q3 = 18,756 / 79,591
- Q3 = 23.57%
- Q4 = 21,760 / 79,591
- Q4 = 27.34%
- 2019
- Q1 = 18,182 / 77,147
- Q1 = 23.57%
- Q2 = 19,161 / 77,147
- Q2 = 24.84%
- Q3 = 18,028 / 77,147
- Q3 = 23.37%
- Q4 = 21, 777 / 77,147
- Q4 = 28.23%
- 5.
- 2016
- Q1 = 8,688 / 18,684
- Q1 = 46.50%
- Q2 = 9,694/ 20,238
- Q2 = 47.90%
- Q3 = 9,017 / 19,226
- Q3 = 46.90%
- Q4 = 10,885 / 21,770
- Q4 = 50%
- 2017
- Q1 = 7,770 / 18,155
- Q1 = 42.80%
- Q2 = 8,796 / 19,289
- Q2 = 45.60%
- Q3 = 8,791 / 19,153
- Q3 = 45.90%
- Q4 = 10,866 / 19,072
- Q4 = 56.97%
- 2018
- Q1 = 8,239 / 19,072
- Q1 = 43.20%
- Q2 = 8,628 / 18,756
- Q2 = 46%
- Q3 = 8,797 / 18,756
- Q3 = 46.90%
- Q4 = 10,684 / 21,760
- Q4 = 49.10%
- 2019
- Q1 = 8,036 / 18,182
- Q1 = 44.20%
- Q2 = 9,006 / 19,161
- Q2 = 47%
- Q3 = 8,329 / 18,028
- Q3 = 46.20%
- Q4 = 11,106 / 21,777
- Q4 = 51%
- 7.
- 2016
- Q2 = (20,238 – 18,684) / 18,684
- Q2 = 8.32%
- Q3 = (19,226 – 20,238) / 20,238
- Q3 = (5%)
- Q4 = (21,770 – 19,226) / 19,226
- Q4 = 13.23%
- 2017
- Q2 = (19,289 – 18,155) / 18,155
- Q2 = 6.25%
- Q3 = (19,153 – 19,289) / 19,289
- Q3 = (0.71%)
- Q4 = (22,543 – 19,153) / 19,153
- Q4 = 17.70%
- Annual = (79,140 – 79,918) / 79,918
- Annual = (0.97%)
- 2018
- Q2 = (18,756 – 19,072) / 19,072
- Q2 = (1.66%)
- Q3 = (18,756 – 18,756) / 18,756
- Q3 = 0
- Q4 = (21,760 – 18,756) / 18,756
- Q4 = 16.02%
- Annual = (78,344 – 79,140) / 79,140
- Annual = (1.01%)
- 2019
- Q2 = (19,161 – 18,182) / 18,182
- Q2 = 5.38%
- Q3 = (18,028 – 19,161) / 19,161
- Q3 = (5.91%)
- Q4 = (21,777 – 18,028) / 18,028
- Q4 = 20.80%
- Annual = (77,148 – 78,344) / 78,344
- Annual = (1.53%)
- 9.
- 2016
- Q2 = (9,694 – 8,688) / 8,688
- Q2 = 11.58%
- Q3 = (9,017 – 9,694) / 9,694
- Q3 = (6.98%)
- Q4 = (10,885 – 9,017) /9,017
- Q4 = 20.72%
- 2017
- Q2 = (8,796 – 7,770) / 7,770
- Q2 = 13.20%
- Q3 = (8,791 – 8,796) / 8,796
- Q3 = (0.06%)
- Q4 = (10,856 – 8,791) / 8,791
- Q4 = 23.49%
- Annual = (36,223 – 38,284) / 38,284
- Annual = (5.38%)
- 2018
- Q2 = (8,628 – 8,239) / 8,239
- Q2 = 4.72%
- Q3 = (8,797 – 8,628) / 8,628
- Q3 = 2%
- Q4 = (10,864 – 8,797) / 8,797
- Q4 = 21.45%
- Annual = (36,348 – 36,223) / 36,223
- Annual = 0.35%
- 2019
- Q2 = (9,006 – 8,036) / 8,036
- Q2 = 12.07%
- Q3 = (8,329 – 9,006) / 9,006
- Q3 = (7.52%)
- Q4 = (11,106 – 8,329) / 8,329
- Q4 = 33.34%
- Annual = (36,477 – 36,348) / 36,348
- Annual = 0.35%