Company background

The Palm Riviera Resort (The Resort) is a hospitality organization, a subsidiary of a global

resorts group headquartered in Europe. The group serves a diverse array of patrons with

highly skilled chefs and other staff. The group’s strategy is the high focus on exceptional

customer care, and smooth customer experience. The Resort is one of the flagship

brands and sites of the group.

The resort has been established 12 years ago in the suburbs of Shanghai to serve the

Group’s clients in the quickly growing Chinese market. Thanks to global key accounts

and cheaper airfares, the business grew fast, and the Resort quickly became profitable

and was more profitable than the group’s similar sized resort in Cappadocia, Turkey.

Things were going well, until the competitive pressure started to erode profits. The

management and stakeholders looked towards the General Manager (GM) who was now

looking more anxious than ever. The was consistently failing to meet the profitability

expectations of the owners. The ownership eventually lost confidence in the

management at the time and decided to make a change. The GM was replaced with a

younger GM. Clients wanted a wider range of services but at competitive costs. Costs of

doing business were increasing; staff cost was increasing; while holiday and normal sales

were shrinking, causing the resort incur losses. Two previous GM’s have already failed to

make the turnaround and got fired. Now it is the third General Manager, who is hired with

the mission of making the turnaround. Failing to make profits in the last three years

made the owners cautious about further investment, so the turnaround should be

achieved with a low budget.

Why is the Resort in crisis?

Based on the industry and economic factors, the Resort should still be profitable. Why is

it in the red then? According to the HRD who has been hired one year ago, it was caused

by bad leadership, by top management complacency, neglecting continuous

improvement and development for many years. Realizing the ineffectiveness of top

management, the owners made a major personnel change one year ago, replacing not

only the General Manager, but also most of the Directors. The new Management Team –

the GM and the Directors – agree that change is needed, and it is needed now.

Plans for the turnaround

The Management Team discussed about and decided the following changes:

• The workforce will be reduced to 600 (250 people will be laid off);

• Staff will be trained to handle more positions, so that they could be deployed

more efficiently

• Business processes will be streamlined; there will be more detailed new KPIs

introduced; P/L will be calculated for each service offered, and managers will be

hold accountable for them

• Currently, overtime fee is a “standard employee benefit”, regardless of the actual

need for overtime. This practice will be changed: overtime pay will be reduced to

the necessary minimal.

The other changes must be implemented within the next 12 months, but there is no

detailed schedule yet.

Current situation and challenges

According to the HRD, there are major roadblocks standing in the way of successful


• The Management Team has consensus about the direction, but the new business

processes and the future organizational structure have not been clarified and

worked out in details, and it is not sure whether they will be able to come up with

a convincing solution.

• The Middle Managers are not supporting the change. It seems they don’t want to

understand the new direction. They are passive in the meetings, and skeptic or

opposing one-on-one. They started as porters in the company for 10-12 years ago

and have been gradually promoted to become managers. According to the

observations of the HRD, many of them show very low managerial and leadership

competencies. Many of them show little capability for independent thinking and

decision making in general, and don’t have much influencing power with their

staff members. Some of them may lack the potential to adapt to their expanded

future managerial roles.

• The General Manager and the Directors are all task focused people with low

“people” awareness and communication skills. They underestimate the resistance

of the people. They don’t recognize the competency gap of the Middle Managers.

They don’t think much about the communication strategy and the human aspects

of change management.

• The morale is already very low in the entire resort. The planned changes would

put higher demands on staff, while their income would decrease, or in best case

equal their current income. This will very likely further undermine their motivation

and productivity.


To ensure that the top management achieves success, you are expected to produce a

3000-word report. In this report you will be required to evidence the following with

reference to the issues highlighted in the case study above:

Task 1: Evaluate and recommend a model of change that might be utilised in

order to develop an environment that would allow the organisation to be

competitive. (60%)

Task 2: Analyse what might be the major resistance from employees on the

recommendations made above and, using appropriate change models and

interventions, how might the CEO mitigate this employee resistance? (40%)

Learning outcomes assessed

2. Explore and critically appraise strategies and methods used for the planning and

management of change

4. Develop a plan to effectively manage a specified change.


Ensure you use the correct report format:

• Cover page with index

• Executive summary (a ‘summary’ of the key recommendations for the CEO. Not in the word count)

• Introduction

• Tasks – main body including analysis and evaluation

• Conclusion

• Recommendations

• References

• Appendices

Please note:

• The word count should be 3000 words (+/- 10%)

• You may include appropriate graphics to support your points if you consider they

will add value to your answer

• This is not to be written as an ‘essay’

• Cover page, Exec Summary, References and Appendices are NOT included in the

word count)

• You must use academic theory and other robust sources to support your text,

and any theory used should be applied to the context of the scenario

• You must use in-text citations to evidence your work, in addition to producing a

full list of references in the bibliography. All of these should conform to Harvard

Referencing format.

• The bulk of this text should be your own original work and should not be

excessively paraphrased.

All papers are written by ENL (US, UK, AUSTRALIA) writers with vast experience in the field. We perform a quality assessment on all orders before submitting them.

Do you have an urgent order?  We have more than enough writers who will ensure that your order is delivered on time. 

We provide plagiarism reports for all our custom written papers. All papers are written from scratch.

24/7 Customer Support

Contact us anytime, any day, via any means if you need any help. You can use the Live Chat, email, or our provided phone number anytime.

We will not disclose the nature of our services or any information you provide to a third party.

Assignment Help Services
Money-Back Guarantee

Get your money back if your paper is not delivered on time or if your instructions are not followed.

We Guarantee the Best Grades
Assignment Help Services