Arguments For and Against International Relations between Asian Countries and Other States Including America (Question 2)
Most Asian countries primarily Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and southern regions of Korea, use a prototype known as the East Asian Model which aids to boost their levels of growth and development. Ideally, the said model entails a monetary structure whereby the administrative and legislative sectors in a given state put money into various fields of their financial system. In turn, this kind of investment galvanizes the augmentation of fresh businesses or trades within the private domain which leads to ameliorated outputs thereby triggering the economic growth of the entire state (Bae et al. 503). Furthermore, the said archetype has also been used in the recent past to categorize and systematize the modern complex of the economy in China thus showing the need for other countries to inculcate the said model into their systems.
In essence, all this is enhanced through the existing favorable relations between the Asian countries such as those between China and both South and North Korea. Here, the agreement signed in 1949 oversees China as North Korea’s prime provider of several vital basic supplies for survival such as food, armaments and stamina. As a result, these kinds of interactions helps in strengthening the nations’ ties thereby creating room for development (Bae et al. 507). As such, the present interactions between the said countries ensure advancements in the nations’ economies which the developing countries could emulate.
Similarly, China also tends to have international bonds between its state and the southern regions of Korea. Here, the legal establishment of the international ties between the People’s Republic of China and South Korea resulted to improved relations between the two states in several fields mainly those with revolutionary alacrity and jurisdictions. In turn, the favorable interactions eventually pay off by improving their sale outputs as well as the gross domestic products annually (Bae et al. 511). Hence the international relations between China and South Korea lead to improved marginal trade links which other countries including USA should mirror, to build their developing financial systems.
Nevertheless, following some remarks made by the current president of the United States, Donald Trump, it is evident that international relations with Asian countries does more harm than good. According to him, the conniving Chinese currency only seeks to destroy America’s economy and should therefore be terminated (Ravenhill 187). In addition, Trump’s views also depict North Korea as the heart of immorality and destruction due to the extent of the country’s nuclear capacities. As a result, North Korea and America tend to lack any official ambassadorial interactions thus showing that the international relations between the said states’ not only tend to be hostile but also irreversible (Ravenhill 193). Here, this is in a way true since in the first case, China is America’s largest competitor and they would do anything to take the first position. Likewise, North Korea not only poses physical threats to the United States but also offers no grounds for the growth of any ties due to their hostility.
Thus, going by the given advantages and disadvantages of inculcating the Asian interactions as well as allowing the growth of those relations with other countries, it would be correct to deduce that developing countries should trend the said field with immense care. This is because, as shown in the essay, international relations with Asian countries could either boost or incapacitate the economic growth and advancement of both developing and developed countries.
Works Cited
Ravenhill, John. “The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect.” Review of International Political Economy 17.2 (2010): 178-208.
Bae, Johngseok, and John J. Lawler. “Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy.” Academy of management journal 43.3 (2000): 502-517.
