- How Jason Innocent is changing the art world as a young black man.
Born in Brooklyn Jason Innocent(1996-) was the son of a Haitian born mother and father. At an early age, he showed a talent for drawing.
Innocent first gained public attention as graffiti poet while still a teenager. Innocent’s creations are manifestos that denounce inequality, racism, prejudice, and discrimination and defend the values of freedom, dignity, and respect. His art is steeped in music and poetry, harmoniously combining elements of everyday life with classic works of art, literature, music, anatomical drawings, and references to the world of sports, history (especially Afro-American history), life and death. In 2017, Black Art Story included Innocent
2. Length: 3000 words
Task
Do investigators have a capacity for logical decision making when making investigative strategy or is it just gut feeling?
Rationale
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:
be able to demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical an operational concepts and financial crime methodologies relevant to the investigative process
be able to demonstrate an understanding and knowledge of the procedures followed by investigators and other stakeholders and challenges arising in these
be able to think critically about the ethical dimensions of investigative functions and how these can impact on processes and procedures.
This will allow the student to research the psychological aspects of logical decision making, the factors that affect an investigators decision making and how this has an impact upon the investigative process and practice.
Marking criteria and standards
Analysis
Analysis not present (0 marks)
Analysis inappropriate (3 marks)
Analysis appropriate but poorly described (6 marks)
Analysis appropriate but containing flaws which invalidate some conclusions (8 marks)
Analysis appropriate (15 marks)
Research
No evidence of research presented (0 marks)
Some evidence of research (3 marks)
Evidence of research and authorities correctly cited (5 marks)
Evidence of research well beyond the suggested readings and authorities correctly cited (10 marks)
Use of CSU library resources
Not used (0 marks)
Used, but not effectively (2 marks)
Used effectively (5 marks)
Structure/Visual presentation/Style
Unstructured (0 marks)
Structured inappropriately (1 mark)
Structured appropriately and professionally presented (3 marks)
Level of detail
Major sections not present and/or contains large unnecessary sections (0 marks)
Some minor omissions and/or contains some unnecessary detail (1 mark)
Comprehensive yet contains no more than the client requires (2 marks)
Total 35
