Assignment 1 Readings
- Husted, B. W. (1993) ‘Reliability and the design of ethical organizations: A rational systems approach (Links to an external site.). Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 761-769.
- Jones, T.M. & Ryan, L.V. (1998) ‘The effect of organizational forces on individual morality: Judgment, moral approbation, and behavior (Links to an external site.)’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 8 (3), 431-45.
- Monahan, S. C., & Quinn, B. A. (2006) ‘Beyond ‘bad apples’ and ‘weak leaders’ Toward a neo-institutional explanation of organizational deviance (Links to an external site.)’, Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 361-385.
- Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988) ‘The organizational bases of ethical work climates’, (Links to an external site.) Administrative Science Quarterly, 101-125.
Chicago
Compare and contrast these readings (Husted 1993; Jones & Ryan 1998; Monahan & Quinn 2006; Victor & Cullen 1998) and produce a 1200 word critical reflection on the four articles about what ethical decision making is, and the factors that influence ethical decision making in organisations.
In this critical reflection you should provide a reasoned explanation for choosing the perspective(s) that you believe best explain ethical decision making in organisations.
Please read the Ethics & Governance – Assessment Guide for details on writing and referencing requirements for this assessment.
** Make sure that all of the 4 readings are being reflected. All.
ARGUMENT AND CHOICE; And which article best explains ethical decisions.
– Lecturer wants a table to be included that talks about what ethical decision making is
And a table that compare and contrasts the articles. (keep It to 200 words)
Have at least 3-4 paragraphs of (250 words each) that totals up to 1000 words ( for the major part of writing)
Primarily focus on these 4 articles . don’t have to do any extensive ones
Please don’t describe the articles.. ARGUE WHY A PARTICULAR article is the best one and WHY WHY WHY.. ARGUE WHY!
( have an introduction, main body and a conclusion)
