The sales and the profitability levels reached by the six companies do not vary significantly. The sales rates have a margin of 2 percent from the lowest to the highest values. As per the bond market salary, all the companies yield a percentage bond summary that lies in a close percentage bracket from 11.1% to 13.2% based on the round one data. Moreover, all the firms seem to have a better product positioning from the traditional bar graph. Baldwin Company allocated more funds for marketing through the promos. In turn, the financial performance of most of the companies meets the set expectations as per the actual and potential market share graph. However, more efforts should be put on Errie and Chester companies. The overall outcome of the organizations’ operations resulted in an impact reflecting on an increase, which is recommendable based on the ethics summary.
As per round two data all the team Digby members possess both long term and current debts, which increase on the total liabilities. In accordance with the bond market summary, the firms possess a yield that lies in the bracket of 12.2% to 13.6%. The closing stock price does not have a great variation from 2016 to 2018. The company’s products are strategically positioned as per the expected segment growth rate of 11.7%. Corresponding to the potential market share for Andrews and the actual market share, there is a need to improve on the market share.
All the companies have over two million shares as per the stock market summary data in round three. However, only Ferris is entitled to a dividend of $2.21, which gives a 7.8% yield. The bond market salary of the companies ranged from 12.5% to 14%. Besides, the firms’ products have a total industry unit demand of 3,293. Based on the accessibility performance, Baldwin company leads. However, other organizations are strategically placed in that there is a minimal competition advantage from one company over the other. This ensures the overall balance profitability gains amongst all the companies based on the product positioning. The size buying criteria is based on the ideal positioning, which has a 43% relevance. Baldwin remains in the lead of marketing as expressed by the finances allocated for this task. The outcome of the operations led to a decline in the demand cost, but the outcome of accessibility and awareness impacts increased.
In round four, Andrews possesses the biggest market share, which is expected as 21.57%. Erie has a declining closing stock price as compared to the other companies. However, Baldwin still maintains a lead in this sector, thereby, evidencing a need of the other companies to emulate the positive traits that make the company a leader in numerous domains. Most of the firms do not have a manufacturing capacity that meets the production. Baldwin Company has the leading market share in round five. All the companies except Chester and Baldwin have both current and long-term debt. There is a general decline in the closing stock price from 2016 to 2020 in round five. The product is well positioned since as per the potential verse actual market share graph, a balance is evidenced. Price and age evaluation are used as the main factors for setting a marketing strategy.
The asset turnover rate in round six of a company, such as Andrews, was higher as compared to other companies. Based on the sales and the profitability statistics, the companies are thriving well. However, only one firm, Chester, had an emergency loan; thereby, showing the preparedness of the companies in tackling their financial needs. There was a general decline in the closing stock price of the industry between 2016 and 2018, but an increase is exhibited by most of the companies from 2018 to 2022. Moreover, there is an amplified total unit demand with the traditional primary segment still maintaining a lead.
As per the data, Digby Company faces difficulties in operating under the annual budget allocated. This is evidenced by the debts both long term and current that most of the team members possess. As such, it would be necessary to cut on some costs such as the promos so that members such as Chester and Baldwin can clear their long term debt. The Company also faces lack of consistency in the market evidenced by the fluctuating closing stock price and the bond market summary. Few of the team members have successfully managed to maintain a rising trend in terms of selling the shares. Besides, only a team member such as Baldwin benefits from the dividends hence showing difficulty on the financial status of the company attributed to the lack of benefiting from the shares by other team members.
