Final Assignment- Analysis of a Technology/System Application Presentation
For the assignment, you are to propose either a change to an existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or propose a new one related to nursing.
I have chosen- Telemedicine
As you are building the presentation, imagine presenting the change to the board of organizational healthcare stakeholders for approval.
Include the following:
- Introduction
- History
- literature review
- Need,
- Proposal idea,
- Implementation strategies,
- Evaluation ideas,
- Financial implications,
- Conclusion.
A minimum of five recent (within the last 5 years), scholarly, peer-reviewed articles are required. I have attached 2 articles that I want to be included. Kindly add 3 more resources.
Kindly follow the matrix strictly.
Unit 6 Assignment: Analysis of a Technology/System Application Paper
| Unit 6 Assignment: Analysis of a Technology/System Application Paper | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic CO1; CO4 | 35.0 pts Level 5 Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic. An existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or a proposed new tool/advance/innovation is included with substantial support. 31.0 pts Level 4 Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic. An existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or a proposed new tool/advance/innovation is included with adequate support 28.0 pts Level 3 Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic. An existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or a proposed new tool/advance/innovation is included with minimal support 24.0 pts Level 2 Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic. An existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or a proposed new tool/advance/innovation is included without substantial support. 21.0 pts Level 1 Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable. An existing technological tool/advance/innovation used in a healthcare system or a proposed new tool/advance/innovation is not provided. 0.0 pts Level 0 Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment. | 35.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views CO1; CO4 | 70.0 pts Level 5 Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. 63.0 pts Level 4 Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. 56.0 pts Level 3 Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. 49.0 pts Level 2 Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches. 42.0 pts Level 1 Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches. 0.0 pts Level 0 Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches. | 70.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process | 65.0 pts Level 5 All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines. 58.5 pts Level 4 Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines. 52.0 pts Level 3 Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for. 45.5 pts Level 2 Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused. 39.0 pts Level 1 Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework. 0.0 pts Level 0 The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework. | 65.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis CO1; CO4 | 75.0 pts Level 5 Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 67.5 pts Level 4 Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 60.0 pts Level 3 Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus. 52.5 pts Level 2 Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities. 45.0 pts Level 1 Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. 0.0 pts Level 0 Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus. | 75.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion | 20.0 pts Level 5 States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings. 18.0 pts Level 4 States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings. 16.0 pts Level 3 States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings. 14.0 pts Level 2 States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings. 12.0 pts Level 1 States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings. 0.0 pts Level 0 States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings. | 20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications | 30.0 pts Level 5 Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications. 27.0 pts Level 4 Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications. 24.0 pts Level 3 Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications. 21.0 pts Level 2 Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications. 18.0 pts Level 1 Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported. 0.0 pts Level 0 Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant. | 30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting | 20.0 pts Level 5 The presentation exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. 18.0 pts Level 4 The presentation exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication. 16.0 pts Level 3 The presentation exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The presentation has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication. 14.0 pts Level 2 The presentation exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The presentation has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. 12.0 pts Level 1 The presentation exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The presentation has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. 0.0 pts Level 0 The presentation does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The presentation has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. | 20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA PRICE-I | 15.0 pts Level 5 The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references. 13.5 pts Level 4 The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 12.0 pts Level 3 The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 10.5 pts Level 2 The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references. 9.0 pts Level 1 Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references. 0.0 pts Level 0 There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references. | 15.0 pts |
| Total Points: 330.0 |
