International Relations about China, Korea, and the USA
International relations encompasses anthropoid ventures and interests where different people, either individually, in conjunction with other republics, or through various associations interact (Fu and Yukl 252). Most scholars view the international relations appellation as a comprehensive term encompassing a number of fields including international economics, politics, war, law, and establishments (Fu and Yukl 252). Ideally, a research on international relations mainly pertains several characteristics of sovereign states and their administrations, explicitly around activities related to the generation and execution of foreign policies. However, the advancing regulated study on the international relations sector incorporates only those features of given republics that tend to pose the most substantial implications on their interactions with other states. Therefore, this essay will focus mainly on the need to develop international relations between the Asian countries, particularly China and Korea, and other countries exemplified by the United States of America on the basis of development in the region and the security issues.
China and America tend to enjoy and hold a number of shared or reciprocated concerns, ranging from political to economical, and affairs revolving around freedom from danger. Among others, some of the mentioned anxieties include the aversion of terrorist attacks and curbing the mushrooming of nuclear ammunitions (Fu and Yukl 261). Nonetheless, some of the interests linked to the duties and responsibilities of self- rules, and the people’s rights in China and America end up being unsettled or open to debate respectively. Similarly, the states also have jurisdictional controversies over the sea located in the southern parts of China. However, China remains the following largest oversees mortgagee of America in the wake of Japan. Therefore, in spite of some military and economic disputes and clashes, the two countries involved in a mutual cooperation, and their individual development is dependent on how their future international relations advance.
Presidents Barack Obama and Hu Jintao gave out a collective statement that asserted the countries’ joint concerns upon the termination of Hu’s visit to DC in 2011. This show of unity promulgated America and China’s allegiance to a favorable, collaborative, and all-inclusive international interaction between the two countries. Moreover, Barack postulated that the United States was ready to embrace China, a determined, lucrative, and famous nation, which immensely contributes to affairs related to the world. Similarly, Hu also agreed that China welcomed America in their dealings as a state that plays a part in the promotion of peace, dependability, and opulence in Asia and the world. After this moment, as each party striven to fulfill their goals, the levels of peaceful interactions increased, as well as some inevitable controversies, which grew especially with the end of Barack’s era. Thus, it is evident that during the presidency of Barack Obama, the US and China were involved rather in a fruitful cooperation aimed at providing mutual benefits to the world and the states.
However, in the recent past, the acclamation and apotheosis of the present-day president of the United States, Donald. J. Trump, has created a substantial strain in the US – Chinese relations. In fact, numerous channels of news foresee probable antagonisms between America and China in some key domains, such as either the commerce or defense sectors. Mainly, the said degenerative anticipation bases its roots in Trump’s remarks over the course of his presidential strategies of campaign, which branded the Chinese currency as being conniving. Similarly, on the other hand. the Chinese people also have their views on their relations with the Americans as given by the general opinion polls. They tend to oscillate approximately at forty to fifty percent favorability for the international relations between China and the United States. According to most political analyst and multiple news outlets, these types of results from the public are bound to deteriorate in the wake of Trump’s reign, which highly disregards the Chinese’ strategies and ways of interacting with America. Therefore, political and economic direction and strategies of Trump provides a negative impact on the mutual cooperation between China and the US.
Secondly, China also has international relations with both the northern and southern parts of Korea. First, the prudent acknowledgements between China and North Korea took place in the fall of the year 1949. However, the said nations signed the main agreement, the Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty in the rise of 1961 (Dyer and Chu 259). This treaty indicated China’s loyalty to its close partner by specifically promising to dispatch any form of assistance, especially military aid to North Korea without delay. Besides, through various meetings from the relevant executives and government officials, the said agreement has been extended twice with the most contemporary held in 2001 being valid up to the fall of 2021. Presently, China perpetuates a consulate in Pyongyang, the capital city of North Korea, and a legation general in the city of Chongjin. While the US and some western countries might no support this union, for the Asian region, this is an ultimate sign of unity to foster its development. As such, China tends to be North Korea’s most crucial associate and most significant collaborator of trade and military defense in order to ensure prosperity of and peace around the Asian region.
Furthermore, China also acts as North Korea’s prime provenance of several vital basic supplies for survival, such as food, armaments, and energy resources. As such, China has not only aided Kim Jong-un to support and authenticate his reign, but also averted the discordant multinational sanctions posed on Korea. Therefore, one can easily deduce that both China and North Korea in the preceding years have relished and shared close non-confrontational affiliations.
Nonetheless, the said close ties have in the recent past weakened by a substantial margin mainly due to some trivial concerns. Some of these matters include the dangerous program in North Korea, overseeing the creation of nuclear ammunitions and the confiscation of fishing boats belonging to the Chinese people (Dyer and Chu 261). China is under pressure from the U. S and the international Security Council to impose sanctions and cut trade deals with North Korea to ensure that the latter stops its nuclear ambitions. Indeed, China should do this as a measure to ensure stability within the Korean peninsula. Moreover, following the favorable opinion polls from the Chinese people, most of the China citizens appear to be losing their trust in North Korean’s interactions with their country. Therefore, in spite of the treatment between North Korea and China, it is evident that the aggressive political and military of the first has made a negative impact on the international relations between the parties.
Moreover, China also has stable relationships with South Korea, North Korea’s nemesis, which directly points to its intension to ensure a peace and prosperity across the Asian Region . The legal establishment of the international ties between the People’s Republic of China and South Korea took place in the August of 1992. However, through most parts of the nineteenth century, the PRC only acclaimed the northern areas of Korea. Conversely, the southern Korean areas only acknowledged China’s republic based in Taiwan. Nonetheless, over the past few years, both China and South Korea have applied extra efforts to enhance their calculated and concerted bonds (Kim and Cha 102). Thus, in the fall of 2012, South Korea, also commonly termed as the Republic of Korea whose acronym is (ROK), commemorated their twentieth jubilee of consular standardization. As such, in the course of the last two decenniums, both China and South Korea have duly improved their ties in a number of fields with revolutionary alacrity and jurisdiction. Some of these fields include the economic arena, political domain, diplomatic ties, as well as ethnic relations. Indeed, China’s move can only be seen as an effort to make the region stronger through establishing peace and stability favorable for trade in the region.
In addition, by diversifying the symmetrical economic synergism, as well as the ensuing benefits of interrelations between China and South Korea, it ultimately leads to development within the said interacting countries. Hence, in the modern world, China tends to be the greatest business associate of South Korea whereas to China, South Korea turns out to be the third in line (Kim and Cha 108). This supports the notion on both China and South Korea’s remarkable growth over the past few years in a bid to improve their relations. In turn, the countries’ efforts eventually paid off in the long run by improving their sale output, as well as the gross domestic products, on the annual basis. Furthermore, the ameliorated international relations between the discussed countries have also overseen the improved marginal trade links between China and South Korea. Hence, China’s move towards the mutual cooperation with South Korea has significantly enhanced the economic development and sustainability around the Asian region.
However, beneath all the given advantages and expected privileges of the improved international relationships between China and South Korea, most of the South Korean citizens tend to have negative impressions and conceptions towards the said cooperation. In essence, this is caused by some bilateral dissensions and embroilments such as the violence perpetrated by Chinese individuals against South Koreans in Beijing throughout the torch relay in the Olympics held in 2008. Besides, the negative notions were also brought about by the orders issued by the Chinese government to deport all the Korean apostates and the murder case recorded in mid-2011 involving a coast guard originating from Korea in Chinese waters (Kim and Cha 117). Moreover, the tax conflicts resulting from the excessive invasions of the Chinese people in South Korean pepper emporiums within the course of the year 2000 also widened the strife between South Korea and China. Additionally, other factors were 2004’s Chinese’ contentious declaration to Koguryo, a prehistoric Korean territory, as well as the prospective disagreements, over the rock of Socotra, which had been anticipated in the beginning of 2012. Hence, the given reasons only serve the purpose of expanding South Korea’s dissatisfaction with China, which if not watched and addressed might lead to poor or weakened international relations between China and South Korea in the future.
Likewise, the United States also tends to have a stand on its international relations with both North and South Koreas. As for North Korea-America’s associations, they have remained unfriendly for a long time. These types of belligerent ties grew and rose mainly due to the war, which North Koreans imposed on the United States of America and its allies. However, in the past years, the said antagonistic bonds increased with North Korea’s five experiments of atomic armaments, the country’s generation of projectiles designed for attacks within long scopes, as well as its constant warnings to attack America and South Korea (Dyer and Chu 282). To this effect, during George Bush’s reign as the American president, he termed North Korea as the heart of immorality and destruction due to the extent of the country’s nuclear capacities. As a result, North Korea and America tend to lack any official ambassadorial interactions, and in turn, Sweden takes over a role of shielding the concerns of the United States for diplomatic issues in North Korea. Thus, this shows that the international relations between North Korea and the USA are not only hostile but also irreversible. Hence, not until the North Koreans end their continuous threats with nuclear weapons to America, then the international relations between the countries will never change. As such, there is a need to have a consensus on North Korea’s military ambitions provided that it does not threaten regional peace and the rest of the world. Nuclear sanctions to a sovereign state only worsen the tense situation and would spark another World War, especially with North Korea’s recent ballistic military weapon tests.
Despite the continued tense relationship between the U.S. and most Asian countries like China and North Korea, the U.S. needs the support of these countries. China remains the U.S.’s largest import origin and third export destination. Therefore, building great trade relations with China is not an option for the U.S. The two countries mutually depend on one another in ensuring that they create jobs for their citizens, raise their GDP, fund their military, and grow their overall economy. Similarly, North Korea’s military prowess can no longer be doubted. China has always supported North Korea and it is time that the U.S. realizes that working with North Korea will be a great step toward international peace. A peaceful approach will be better than sanctions, which have done little so far in taming the situation. Given that the U.S. has managed to work with countries like Iraq and Syria in the fight against terrorism, there is a chance of doing the same with North Korea by cooperating with other global leaders like China.
Indeed, going by the numerous discussions brought out in the course of this research, it is indeed right to postulate that strong international relations between countries are extremely important. This is seen through the types of relations between countries like America and China, whereby even though many academics deem it the most intricate relationship, it tends to yield positive results. In the same way, the interactions between China and North Korea, even though gradually weakening due to their obsession with nuclear weapons, also lead to ameliorated and developed nations as clearly brought out in the paper. Similarly, the global relations between South Korea and China also depict improved trade margins between the given states. However, as indicated in the essay, it would be immensely vital to check on the various stated disenchantments of South Korea with China in order to maintain the said positive international relations. Finally, as precisely indicated in the essay, the collaboration between America and North Korea are not only detrimental and hostile but also hazardous. This, as shown, occurs due to the many pending threats issued to Americans by the North Koreans, which has to change for any diplomatic interrelations to take place between America and North Korea. On the contrary, the cooperation between the United States and South Korea tend to be substantially favorable for both countries. This was accentuated by the fact that America helped in shaping the modern South Korean society. Finally, the different presidents indicated in the paper had different perspectives about their countries’ international relations with either China, North Korea, or America. Therefore, the U.S. should realize that working with Asia is not an option. China, for example, can be a key ally to help fight terrorism and ensure a mutual ground is reached between the former and North Korea.
Works Cited
Dyer, Jeffrey H., and Wujin Chu. “The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea. “Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, 2000, pp. 259-285.
Fu, Ping Ping, and Gary Yukl. “Perceived Effectiveness of Influence Tactics in the United States and China.” The Leadership Quarterly, vol.11, no. 2, 200, pp. 251-266.
Kim, Ellen, and Victor Cha. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: South Korea’s Strategic Dilemmas with China and the United States.” Asia Policy, vol.21, no. 1, 2016, pp. 101-121.
International Relations between Asian Countries and Other States including the U.S.
Most Asian countries primarily Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and southern regions of Korea, use a prototype known as the East Asian Model, which aids to boost their levels of growth and development. Ideally, the mentioned model entails a monetary structure whereby the administrative and legislative sectors in a given state put money into various fields of their financial system. In turn, this type of investment galvanizes the augmentation of fresh businesses or trades within a private domain, which leads to ameliorated outputs thereby triggering the economic growth of the entire state. Furthermore, the said archetype has also been used in the recent past to categorize and systematize the modern complex of the economy in China, showing the need for other countries to inculcate the said model into their systems.
In essence, all these developments are enhanced through the existing favorable relations between the Asian countries, such as those between China and both South and North Koreas. The 1949 agreement oversees China as North Korea’s prime provider of several vital basic supplies for survival such as food, armaments, and energy resources. As a result, this collaboration helps in strengthening the nations’ ties; thereby, creating room for the development (Dyer and Chu 259). As such, the present interactions between the said countries ensure advancements in the nations’ economies, which the emerging merkets could emulate.
Similarly, China also tends to have international bonds between its state and the southern regions of Korea. Hece, the legal establishment of the international ties between the People’s Republic of China and South Korea resulted in improved relations between the two states in those fields with revolutionary alacrity and jurisdictions. In turn, in the course of time, the cooperation paid off by enhancing their annual sale outputs and the gross domestic products . Hence, the international relations between China and South Korea lead to improved marginal trade links, which other countries including USA should mirror to build their sustainable financial systems.
Nevertheless, following some remarks made by the current president of the United States, Donald Trump, it is evident that international relations with Asian countries do more harm than good. According to Trump, the conniving Chinese currency only seeks to destroy America’s economy; therefore, it should be terminated. In addition, Trump’s views also depict North Korea as the heart of immorality and destruction due to the extent of the country’s nuclear capacities. As a result, North Korea and America tend to lack any official ambassadorial interactions, thereby, showing that the international relations between the said states’ not only tend to be hostile but also irreversible. To be more specific, this is in a way true since in the first case, China is America’s largest competitor, and each of them would do anything to take the first position. Likewise, North Korea not only poses physical threats to the United States but also offers no grounds for the growth of any ties due to their hostility. However, North Korea should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons provided it does not pose a threat to regional and global peace.
Thus, going by the given advantages and disadvantages of inculcating the Asian interactions, as well as allowing the growth of those relations with other countries, it would be correct to deduce that developing countries should trend the said field with the immense care. Indeed, international relations between the U.S. and Asian countries could either boost or incapacitate the economic growth and advancement of both developing and developed countries. China and the U.S. can form formidable allies in the fight against terrorism and ensuring global peace as well as improving their ground in their supremacy as economic superpowers.
Work Cited
Dyer, Jeffrey H., and Wujin Chu. “The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea.” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, 2000, pp. 259-285.
