Description of the Assignment
This assignment requires the student to develop a rubric for a written learning activity. The learning activity must be a written assignment with no PowerPoint, oral, return demonstration, or simulation learning activities to be used. The MSN student may select the focus of the learning activity to be within a nurse professional development or an academic setting.
Criteria for Content
Description of the learning activity required of learners: Within this section, the MSN student provides the following required elements.
- Identification of the purpose of written assignment
- Description of the required WRITTEN learning activity
- Identification of the level of the learner
- Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)
- Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy
Identification of content and format criteria for the WRITTEN learning activity: Within this section, the MSN student provides the following required elements.
- Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activity
- Explain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomes
- Transfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric template
- Identification of two format criteria for the written learning activity
- Explain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomes
- Transfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template
Identification of performance levels for the learning activity: Within this section, the MSN student provides the following required elements.
- Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual description
- Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parameters
- Descriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusive
- Placement of performance levels in the rubric template
Development of descriptors for each criterion at each level of performance for the learning activity: Within this section, the MSN student provides the following required elements.
- Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance level
- Identification of descriptors that are mutually exclusive
- Identification of descriptions that are measurable
- Add descriptors within the rubric template
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
The information related to the following sections is presented using a paragraph style. These sections are noted to be the following.
- Description of the learning activity required of learners
- Self-reflection
- The rubric for the written assignment is to be presented via the required template located within the Assignment area of NR537.
- Title page and reference page (if needed) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
| Assignment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Description of the learning activity required of learners | 45 | 25 | Required content for this section includes demonstration of the following. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learnerIdentification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy |
| Identification of content and format criteria for the learning activity | 50 | 28 | Required content for this section includes demonstration of the following. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template |
| Identification of performance levels for the learning activity | 25 | 14 | Required content for this section includes demonstration of the following. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template |
| Develop descriptors for each criterion at each level of performance for the learning activity | 50 | 28 | Required content for this section includes demonstration of the following. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template |
| Scholarly writing | 10 | 6 | Required content for this section includes demonstration of the following. Rules of APA citation styleScholarly grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
| Total | 180 | 100% |
Grading Rubric
| Assignment Criteria | Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance | Exceeds Very good or high level of performance | Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance | Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance | Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Content Possible Points = 170 | |||||
| Description of the learning activity required of learners | 45 Points | 40 Points | 36 Points | 17 Points | 0 Points |
| Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learner Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy | Presentation of information was good and included all the following elements but was superficial in places. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learner Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy | Presentation of information was noted in all the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learner Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy | Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learner Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy | Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements. Identification of the purpose of written assignmentDescription of the required WRITTEN learning activityIdentification of the level of the learner Identification of practice setting of the learner (i.e., nurse professional development; academic)Provide two learning outcomes for the required written assignment using Bloom’s revised taxonomy | |
| Identification of content and format criteria for the learning activity | 50 Points | 44 Points | 40 Points | 19 Points | 0 Points |
| Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template | Presentation of information was good and included all the following elements but was superficial in places. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template | Presentation of information was noted in all the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template | Presentation of information in one, two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template | Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements. Identification of three content criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the three content criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the three content criteria to the rubric templateIdentification of two format criteria for the written learning activityExplain how each of the two format criteria contribute to the identified learning outcomesTransfer each of the two format criteria to the rubric template | |
| Identification of performance levels for the learning activity | 25 Points | 22 Points | 20 Points | 10 Points | 0 Points |
| Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template | Presentation of information was good and included all the following elements but was superficial in places. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template | Presentation of information was noted in all the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template | Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template | Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements. Identification of four performance levels for the written learning activity with a textual descriptionIdentification of four performance levels for the written learning activity using numerical parametersDescriptors of the required performance level are mutually exclusivePlacement of performance levels in the rubric template | |
| Develop descriptors for each criterion at each level of performance for the learning activity | 50 Points | 44 Points | 40 Points | 19 Points | 0 Points |
| Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template | Presentation of information was good and included all the following elements but was superficial in places. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template | Presentation of information was noted in all the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template | Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template | Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements. Identification of descriptors for each criterion at each performance levelIdentification of descriptors that are mutually exclusiveIdentification of descriptions that are measurableAdd descriptors within the rubric template | |
| Content Subtotal _____ of 170 Points | |||||
| Format Possible Points = 10 | |||||
| Criteria Scholarly writing at the graduate level | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points |
| 1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual | 9 or more errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
