Week 6 Assignment: Direct Care Project Part 4: Evaluating the Project (Graded)
Points 200 Submitting a file upload
Purpose
The purpose of this direct care project is for learners to apply the nursing process to assess if the nursing care provided by professionally certified nurses will result in improved patient outcomes. This is Part 4 of 4 in the Direct Care Project.
Direct Care Project Overview
There will be graded Project Check-ins that correlate to each part.
The topic selected in Part 1 will be the same one used in Parts 2 through 4.
Review the table below for overview and due dates with each topic.
Contact your instructor with questions.
Overview Points Due Date Project
Part 1: Assessment and Diagnosis completed in Week 2
Part 2: Planning the Presentation completed in Week 4
Part 3: Implementing the Presentation Completed in Weeks 5 or 6
Part 4: Evaluation: Check-In 10 Wednesday of Week 6 Required, graded check-in on progress of evaluation of your presentation and project.
Part 4: Evaluating the Project 200 Sunday end of Week 6 Evaluate learning and reflect on project.
Course Outcomes
This direct care project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)
Part 4 enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of quality nursing care. (PO 2)
CO 2: Apply the nursing process to quality improvement of patient-centered care outcomes. (POs 4, 7)
Due Date for Part 4
Points Possible for Part 4
200 Points
Late Assignment Policy
If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Directions for Part 4
View the Direct Care Project Part 4 Tutorial (Click here to view) (Links to an external site.).
Download the Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project template below.
Gather the information from the surveys and attendance form.
Complete the template with the following:
Attendance form data
Include names, titles, and organization
Tables of results
PRE-Survey and POST-Survey results in numerical form
Interpretation of results
Summarize data in the tables
Include any positive or negative changes
Reflection
Overall experience
Summary of outcomes from the pre and post surveys
Gaps in project (Examples: What else would have been helpful? More data? Better resources?)
Barriers to the project (Examples: participant interest, time, limited resources, willingness for change)
Implications for future practice
How could this project impact your professional practice?
Submit the Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project template and the attendance form. The attendance form will be a separate submission in the grades area.
Please note, your assignment will not be graded until the attendance form is submitted.
Template
Click on the link below to download your template.
Direct Care Part 4: Evaluating the Project Template (Download Here) (Links to an external site.)
Best Practices
Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
Use the template provided. If the template is not used, a deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed.
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Rubric
Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project
Direct Care Project Part 4 Evaluating the Project
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle and Tables of results
1. Title of presentation is present
2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form
3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form
4. All survey questions addressed in data
45.0 pts
Exceptional
All criteria are met 1. Title of presentation is present 2. PRE-Survey data is present in numerical form 3. POST-Survey data is present in numerical form 4. Each question addressed in data
40.0 pts
Exceeds
Provides three of four criteria.
36.0 pts
Meets
Provides two of four criteria.
18.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provides one of four criteria.
0.0 pts
Developing
Provides no criteria.
45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation of results
In comprehensive details, student
1. Summarized results of data
2. Identified positive or negative changes
50.0 pts
Exceptional
Summarizes in excellent detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.
44.0 pts
Exceeds
Summarizes in good detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.
40.0 pts
Meets
Summarizes in fair detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes.
18.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Summarizes in minimal detail the results of the data and identifies positive or negative changes
0.0 pts
Developing
Provides no criteria.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 1
Reflection includes detailed description of:
1. Overall experience
2. Summary of outcome results
40.0 pts
Exceptional
Reflection includes detailed description of overall experience and summary of outcome results.
35.0 pts
Exceeds
Reflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in one criterion.
32.0 pts
Meets
Reflection includes description of overall experience and summary of outcome results but lacks details in both criteria
15.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing one criterion.
0.0 pts
Developing
Provides no experience or summary.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Part 2
Reflection includes detailed description of:
1. Barriers to project
2. Gaps in the project
3. Implications for future practice
40.0 pts
Exceptional
Reflection includes detailed description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice.
35.0 pts
Exceeds
Reflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in one criterion.
32.0 pts
Meets
Reflection includes description of barriers to project, gaps in the project and implications for future practice, but lacks details in 2-3 criteria.
15.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 1-2 criteria.
0.0 pts
Developing
Provides no barriers, gaps or implications.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism
Professionalism includes:
1. Correct spelling
2. Readable
3. Uses complete sentences
4. Proper grammar
25.0 pts
Exceptional
Meets all four criteria: 1. Correct spelling 2. Readable 3. Uses complete sentences 4. Proper grammar
22.0 pts
Exceeds
Does not meet one criterion.
20.0 pts
Meets
Does not meet 2 criteria.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not meet 3 criteria.
0.0 pts
Developing
Does not meet all criteria.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTemplate Used
0.0 pts
No points deducted
Correct Template Used
0.0 pts
Points deducted – 20 Points Deducted (10% deduction)
20 points deducted (10%) for incorrect or no template used.
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts
No points deducted
Submitted on time
0.0 pts
Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day)
1 day late = 10 Deduction; 2 day late = 20 Deduction; 3 day late = 30 Deduction; 4 day late = 40 Deduction; 5 day late = 50 Deduction; 6 day late = 60 Deduction; 7 day late = 70 Deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0
