The Question: Is the movement towards human security a true paradigm shift?
In answering this question make sure to consider which of the authors whom you have read in Weeks one to four of the course support your view and which do not. *Rely on the lessons and/or readings for the analytical essay*
The lessons were broken down into four different sections: Human, Food, Personal, and Environmental Security.
Readings from Week 1-4:
– NEWMAN, E. (2010). Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 77-94.
– Paris, R. (2001). Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security, 26(2), 87/102.
– Kaldor, M. (2011). Human security. Society and Economy, 33(3), 441-448.
– Howard-Hassmann, R. (2012). Human security: Undermining human rights? Human Rights Quarterly, 34(1), 88-112.
– Frerks, Georg, and Kees Homan. “Human security: a launching pad for debate and policy?.” Security & Human Rights 19, no. 1 (January 2008): 1-7. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed August 31, 2015).
– Rosegrant, M. W., & Cline, S. A. (2003). Global food security: Challenges and policies. Science, 302(5652), 1917-9.
– Shamsie, Yasmine. “Haiti’s Post-Earthquake Transformation: What of Agriculture and Rural Development?.” Latin American Politics & Society 54, no. 2 (Summer2012 2012): 133-152. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed September 7, 2015).
– Meenar, M. R., & Hoover, B. M. (2012). Community food security via urban agriculture: Understanding people, place, economy, and accessibility from a food justice perspective. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 3(1), 143-160.
– Bastian, Amber, and John Coveney. (2013). “The responsibilisation of food security: What is the problem represented to be?.”Health Sociology Review 22, no. 2: 162-173.
– Jr, Joseph W. Foxell (2010). Current Trends in Agroterrorism (Antilivestock, Anticrop, and Antisoil Bioagricultural Terrorism) And their Potential Impact on Food Security. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24(2), 107-29.
– Saswati, B., Ceccacci, I., Delgado, C., Townsend, R. (2010). Food Security and Conflict. World Development Report 2011.
– Basaran, H. R., L.L.M. (2014). Identifying the responsibility to protect. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 38(1), 195-212.
– Panait, I. (2014). FROM HUMAN SECURITY TO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Research and Science Today, 1(7), 51-60.
– Paris, R. (2014). The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and the Structural Problems of Preventative Humanitarian Intervention, International Peacekeeping, 21(5), 569-603
– Ziegler, Charles E. 2016. “Contesting the Responsibility to Protect.” International Studies Perspectives, 17(1), 75-97.
– Responsibility to Protect. United Nations Website.
– Winarno, B. (2017). Environmental Crisis: A Global Threat of Human Security. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 6(1). 81–98.
– Setiawan, F., and Hapsari, F. (2017). Securitizing e-Waste: Framing Environmental Issue as a Threat to Human Security.” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 6(2). 210–220.
– Greaves, W. (2016). Securing Sustainability: The Case for Critical Environmental Security in the Arctic. Polar Record 52(6), 660-71.
– Martin, K. (2014). The Environmental and Human Security Nexus: An Extraordinary Opportunity for Change.” EcoHealth 11(3), 439–441.
– Khan, A. (2014). Climate change vulnerabilities – legal status of the displaced people. Environmental Policy and Law, 44(3), 325-333.
——
Paper should be an analytical essay. Do not use a cover page. Instead, create a header and footer with your name.
Your submission should be four pages (no more, no less) and look like this:
Introduction: Introduce your topic & include a thesis. To help you set up your analytical essay include three reasons why you agree or disagree with the midterm questions. By doing so, you will set up the body of your paper. The introduction should be 1/2 page.
The Body: The body will focus on your three reasons that you either agree or disagree with the midterm question. Each reason should take up about 1 page and include support from the readings and lessons.
Conclusion: The conclusion will wrap up your paper, and re-state your three reasons. This should be about ½ page.
Reference List: Include a reference list in Turabian format. This list will not count towards the four pages.
Use Turabian in-text citation with a reference list. Do not include footnotes.
